School Shooting Involving a 6 Year Old Boy Essay Example for Free

School Shooting Involving a 6 Year Old Boy EssayA 6 year old son brought a gun to school and shot and killed a fellow classmate. The police conducted a search of the boys home and strand another stolen gun (12 gauge shot gun) and illegal drugs in the willpower of the boys 19 year old familiar, who was charged with involuntary man slaughter. The most possible situations that could have led this boy to commit such a violent crime would be guided participation, emotional regulation, and reactive aggression. Michigan state law says that any children under the age of heptad are not considered criminally responsible for their actions. The charges for this crime were filed against the 19 year old brother who was found in possession of stolen guns and illegal drugs.As children develop over time their greatest influences are their parents and their peers. Kathleen Berger (2011), source of The Developing Person Through the Life Span, defines guided participation as, the process b y which people develop from others who guide their experiences and explorations (p.241). Parents will set the standard for what children will view as the carriage life should be lived. Sadly, in this particular circumstance the 6 year old boys two manlike role models both reside in jail for gun-related charges.This child may have been exposed to nine-fold different kinds of behavior involving gun power. Behavior such as this would send a message to the child, this is the way you dismount what you want in life. However if this child were raised in a Christian home, this pip may have been prevented. In Proverbs 226 (NKJV) it says Train up a child in the way he should go, And when he is old he will not depart from it.Another circumstance that may have led to this violent crime happening ispoorly demonstrable emotional regulation. worked up regulation is defined by Berger (2011) as, the ability to control when and how emotions are expressed (p.265). In child increment emotional regulation is developed from the ages of 2 to 6. If this 6 year old boy suffers from poorly developed emotional regulation, this could have led to his nip of a classmate. If a child is never made to fancy that there are consequences to their actions, then they will never be able to determine how far is likewise far.As children our sin temper is for us to get upset and angry when we dont get what we want, or when things dont go our way. Resulting in a fit or temper fit being thrown that may involve violent behavior. Reaction aggression is defined by Berger (2011) as, propensity retaliation for another persons intentional or accidental action, verbal or somatogenic (p.279). The goal behind this behavior is to get their way or get what they want. In the process who or what they may hurt in the process is of no concern to them. This type of behavior is our sin nature that we are born with, if not corrected further violent behavior patterns such as the shooting of a classmate may occur.In closing, the 6 year old boy who earlier that twenty-four hours shot a classmate could have been affected by guided participation, emotional regulation, and reactive aggression. direct participation may have played the role of this 6 year old boy discover conflicts being resolved via gun violence by the role models in his home. If such behavior was ascertained this 6 year old boy may not have developed emotional regulation, if he were to develop emotional regulation it may have prevented this crime from ever happening. Reaction aggression may have also played a key role leading up to this crime.If gun violence was theatrical roled in the home, it is only natural for this 6 year old boy to also use gun violence. Michigan state law believes children under the age of seven are presumed to lack tariff are not considered criminally responsible for their actions. Since the police found the 19 year old brother in possession of stolen weapons he was charged with involuntary ma nslaughter for the shooting. The police viewed the 6 year old boy as a product of his surroundings and in no way could he fully generalize theextent of his actions earlier that day.ReferencesBerger, K. (2011). The Developing Person Through the Life Span (8th ed., p. 241,265,279). New York Worth.